Authors
Kimberly I Chew and Jacqueline L von Salm
Published
September 25, 2024
Abstract
This paper delves into the crucial yet complex relationship between federal laws and scientific research, centering on the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and the Federal Analogue Act (FAA). The CSA classifies substances into schedules, dictating the scope of scientific inquiry, particularly for Schedule I drugs, which have no recognized medical use and high potential for abuse. Researchers interested in these substances face a rigorous registration process, ensuring scientific advancements adhere to legal constraints. On the other hand, the FAA targets substances similar in structure and effect to controlled drugs, treating them as Schedule I if intended for human consumption. This presents a significant challenge to researchers who must meticulously assess legal risks and compliance to avoid inadvertent infringements. Compounds only an atom away from being classified as non-hallucinogenic can skirt the borders of legality, requiring carefully navigated research paths. Within this framework, researchers are tasked with navigating a maze of regulations—securing permits, conducting ethically-approved studies, and keeping detailed records. These efforts are critical for preserving the integrity and legitimacy of scientific work. In summary, the CSA and FAA are cornerstones of legal guidance for research related to controlled substances. They necessitate a proactive, well-informed research approach ensuring adherence to evolving legal standards and reinforcing the foundational values of responsible scientific practice. Compliance with these acts not only mitigates against the proliferation of illicit drugs but also consolidates the ethical pursuit of scientific knowledge.
To access the full publication from the Drug Science Policy and Law journal, please see below: